Conundrum of Reconfiguration
No country’s judicial system can be more apt than being the cornerstones of democracy for delivering justice and upholding constitutional values. When growing demands are made upon the judiciary, the very structure and efficiency of it get most extensively tested. In most countries, including India, talk of restructuring the NCA or the National Court of Appeal led people to wonder whether it was necessary, possible, and what that in itself would imply in terms of the judicial role that would be accorded to this in the institutions. This reflection elaborates on the complexities surrounding the reform of the NCA and why, essentially, restructuring the NCA could be crucial for a more efficacious legal framework. .
The Case for a National Court of Appeal
A National Court of Appeal, often viewed as an intermediate appellate court between the High Courts and the Supreme Court, would be provided for in many countries due to the backlog of cases facing the Supreme Court. In India, the Supreme Court has a tremendous amount of caseload, and most of the cases brought before it are not constitutional in nature but rather run-of-the-mill appeals. This accounts for most of the backlogs.
Division of the caseload through preparing an NCA, to dispose of general appeals at the NCA level and reserve constitutional and important legal matters for the Supreme Court. This will also aid in directing the high court precisely toward its original mandate to interpret the Constitution and matters of national importance.
Current issues that are prompting restructuring
Among them is the coercing of judicial reform and one such creation is the NCA, that emerges on many critical issues.
The major reason for restructuring is that there is a huge backlog in the Supreme Court. The cases sometimes drag so much that the court is overburdened with cases ranging from monetary disputes, which are quite petty in nature, to very complex constitutional issues. The court hardly gives priority in cases that require immediate constitutional intervention when there is inadequate time and resources.
Dilation of the role of the Supreme Court in the Constitution: The Supreme Court has gradually metamorphosed into a court of appeal for all types of legal disputes, thereby losing its original function as the actual protector of the Constitution. The reorientation of the NCA aims to reposition the Supreme Court back on the pedestal as a constitutional court.
Access to Justice: The geographical distance most citizens are from the Supreme Court of most countries limits access to justice. An NCA would give litigants another layer of recourse on appeal without being required to approach the Supreme Court for every matter. This would also enhance access to justice amongst citizens who live far away from the capital center.
Judicial Efficiency and Delays: Late justice is no justice at all. It is by restructuring and establishing an NCA that the judicial system could function efficiently, such that cases would be handled more promptly and justice delivered without undue delays.
The Problems of Re-alignment
While the cases for restructuring the NCA are quite attractive, challenges in its formation and operationalization do not seem far away:
Constitutional Amendments: A National Court of Appeal demands constitutional amendments especially because, like India, the Constitution outlines the role and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. It takes time and faces political resistance.
Jurisdictional Complexity: The question of ascertaining clear jurisdiction between the Supreme Court and High Courts concerning the Supreme Court’s and High Courts’ appeals is very knotty. In restructuring, it has to be maintained that the NCA does not tread upon the jurisdictions of the Supreme Court while effectively dealing with appeals.
Resistance from Legal and Judicial Communities: Undoubtedly, the judiciary restructuring will cause a considerable stir within the legal community. Many feel that the current system should be further reformed rather than having one more layer of courts. They argue that judicial case management along with digitization, along with better appointment processes, would benefit much more than a new appeals body.
Cost and Administrative Burden: Establishing a new court system is, by itself, such an extremely costly and administratively burdensome enterprise. The infrastructures to staff set up could deter governments from taking up the initiative. More importantly, duplicating what already exists without solving the root cause of the delay might prove counterproductive.
Possible Advantages of NCA
Despite the difficulties, reforming NCA may bring a lot of benefits to the judiciary:
Relief to the Supreme Court: Its routine appellate cases may be directed to the NCA, so freeing the Supreme Court to concentrate on matters of constitutional vital importance, thereby making it work better and a better quality of jurisprudence.
Timely Justice: It would mean quicker resolution of cases with reconfiguration. The judiciary may provide relief from the backlog by streamlining the process as well as making sure that the Supreme Court does not get overloaded.
Specialization: A National Court of Appeal may pave the way for a more specialized focus on appellate matters, which can lead toward more uniform or consistent interpretation of law throughout the jurisdictions.
Building Back the Prestige of the Supreme Court: If the NCA is reconstructed along constitutional and national lines, then it will help to reconstruct back the pride of the Supreme Court from being an over-burdened court of appeal rather than the high altar of constitutionalism.
International Precedents for Re-Structuring
Countries like the United States and Canada have established judicial systems in which top courts reach a decision on constitutional or issues of great import only; other appeals are dispensed by appellate courts. In the U.S. for example, Circuit Courts are appellate courts for most cases while the Supreme Court hears cases of national importance only selectively. It has therefore reduced the workload on the Supreme Court so much that it can focus its efforts on the development of constitutional law.
Going by this, countries considering the restructuring of the NCA might get something to learn from the examples around the world to fashion a system that attains efficiency without compromising constitutional rights.
Conclusion
There is indeed a two-fold basis for the restructuring requirement of the National Court of Appeal: increased strains on modern judicial systems and the need to keep constitutional integrity intact. While the creation of an NCA could solve most of the problems besetting the current system, it also throws up quite a set of legal, administrative, and political issues. Thus, while the idea of an NCA has been long debated at least in countries like India, the decision to take the step towards its formation might be a major judicial reform move. However it needs to be done with utmost care in the implications for the overall judicial structure and access to courts.
Conclusion It may be that restructuring the National Court of Appeal is an essential piece towards holding up a judicature, if at all effective and more accessible and constitutionally aligned.
Read More: Click Here
